Gordon v. Collecto, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 20, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-00181·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 NOBLE GORDON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00181-DAD-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT 11 v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF 12 | COLLECTO, INC., CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendant. (ECF No. 16) 14 15 On March 11, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice with 16 | each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 17 | been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 18 | (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 19 | attorneys’ fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 21 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 FA. 94 | Dated: _March 19, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. Collecto, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Gordon v. Collecto, Inc. (Gordon v. Collecto, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)