Gordon v. Collecto, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOBLE GORDON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00181-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF COLLECTO, INC., CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendant. (ECF No. 16) On March 11, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. 94 Dated: _March 19, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gordon v. Collecto, Inc. (Gordon v. Collecto, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.