Gordon v. Collecto, Inc.

E.D. California

Gordon v. Collecto, Inc.

DecidedMarch 20, 2020

Docket1:19-cv-00181

StatusUnknown

This text of Gordon v. Collecto, Inc. (Gordon v. Collecto, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gordon v. Collecto, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 NOBLE GORDON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00181-DAD-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT 11 v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF 12 | COLLECTO, INC., CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendant. (ECF No. 16) 14 15 On March 11, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice with 16 | each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 17 | been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 18 | (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 19 | attorneys’ fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 21 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 FA. 94 | Dated: _March 19, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 NOBLE GORDON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00181-DAD-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT 11 v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF 12 | COLLECTO, INC., CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendant. (ECF No. 16) 14 15 On March 11, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice with 16 | each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 17 | been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 18 | (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 19 | attorneys’ fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 21 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 FA. 94 | Dated: _March 19, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gordon v. Collecto, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-collecto-inc-caed-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack