Gordon v. City of New Brunswick

174 A. 522, 12 N.J. Misc. 736, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 17
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 17, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 174 A. 522 (Gordon v. City of New Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. City of New Brunswick, 174 A. 522, 12 N.J. Misc. 736, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 17 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal was submitted at the same time as the case of Buckelew v. New Brunswick, 113 N. J. L. 338, and on substantially similar evidence. In the JBuckelew ease the respondent was a farmer selling his produce; in the present case, respondent was a huckster, attending at the market to by his daily supply. This is the only distinction between the cases, and it is a distinction without a legal difference.

For the reasons stated in the Buckelew case and applicable here, the judgment under review will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 A. 522, 12 N.J. Misc. 736, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-city-of-new-brunswick-nj-1934.