Gordon v. City of New Brunswick
This text of 174 A. 522 (Gordon v. City of New Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal was submitted at the same time as the case of Buckelew v. New Brunswick, 113 N. J. L. 338, and on substantially similar evidence. In the JBuckelew ease the respondent was a farmer selling his produce; in the present case, respondent was a huckster, attending at the market to by his daily supply. This is the only distinction between the cases, and it is a distinction without a legal difference.
For the reasons stated in the Buckelew case and applicable here, the judgment under review will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A. 522, 12 N.J. Misc. 736, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-city-of-new-brunswick-nj-1934.