Gordon v. Chase

Fourth Circuit

Gordon v. Chase

140 F. App'x 472

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2005·No. No. 05-1246·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Earl S. Gordon appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gordon v. Chase, No. CA-04-1013-AMD (D. Md. June 18, 2004; filed Feb. 17, 2005 & entered Feb. 22, 2005). Gordon’s motion for a restraining order is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Earl S. Gordon appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gordon v. Chase, No. CA-04-1013-AMD (D. Md. June 18, 2004; filed Feb. 17, 2005 & entered Feb. 22, 2005). Gordon’s motion for a restraining order is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Gordon v. Chase, 140 F. App'x 472 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

140 F. App'x 472 (Gordon v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.