Gordon v. Caldcleugh

Supreme Court

Gordon v. Caldcleugh

7 U.S. 268, 2 L. Ed. 436, 3 Cranch 268, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 332

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 13, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 7 U.S. 268 (Gordon v. Caldcleugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gordon v. Caldcleugh, 7 U.S. 268, 2 L. Ed. 436, 3 Cranch 268, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 332 (1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.,

after stating the ease, delivered the opinion of the court.

This court has no jurisdiction under the 25th section of the judiciary act of 1789, but in a case where a final judgment or decree has been rendered in the highest court of law or equity of a state, in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity, &e., or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission *held under, the United States, and the decision is against p27o the title, right, privilege or exception, specially set up or claimed by *- either party under such clause of the said constitution, treaty, statute or commission.

In the present case, such of the defendants as were aliens, filed a petition to remove the cause to the federal circuit court, under the 12th section of the same act. The state court granted the prayer of the petition, and ordered the cause to be removed; the decision, therefore, was not against the privilege claimed under the statute; and therefore, this court has no jurisdiction in the case. The writ of error must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Ch. J.,

after stating the ease, delivered the opinion of the court.

This court has no jurisdiction under the 25th section of the judiciary act of 1789, but in a case where a final judgment or decree has been rendered in the highest court of law or equity of a state, in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity, &e., or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission *held under, the United States, and the decision is against p27o the title, right, privilege or exception, specially set up or claimed by *- either party under such clause of the said constitution, treaty, statute or commission.

In the present case, such of the defendants as were aliens, filed a petition to remove the cause to the federal circuit court, under the 12th section of the same act. The state court granted the prayer of the petition, and ordered the cause to be removed; the decision, therefore, was not against the privilege claimed under the statute; and therefore, this court has no jurisdiction in the case. The writ of error must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 U.S. 268, 2 L. Ed. 436, 3 Cranch 268, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-caldcleugh-scotus-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack