Gordon v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gordon v. Brown

197 A.D.2d 475, 603 N.Y.S.2d 3

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 475 (Gordon v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gordon v. Brown, 197 A.D.2d 475, 603 N.Y.S.2d 3 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated January 30, 1992, which dismissed petitioner from the Police Department, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR [476]*476article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County, William P. McCooe, J., entered on or about July 21, 1992), dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner received a fair hearing since he had the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses giving material testimony against him (cf., Matter of Erdman v Ingraham, 28 AD2d 5). There is no need for the respondent to make available the people who actually performed the tests since EMIT and GCMS tests are reliable indicators of drug use (Matter of Shepard v Ward, 155 AD2d 293).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated January 30, 1992, which dismissed petitioner from the Police Department, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR [476]*476article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County, William P. McCooe, J., entered on or about July 21, 1992), dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner received a fair hearing since he had the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses giving material testimony against him (cf., Matter of Erdman v Ingraham, 28 AD2d 5). There is no need for the respondent to make available the people who actually performed the tests since EMIT and GCMS tests are reliable indicators of drug use (Matter of Shepard v Ward, 155 AD2d 293).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 475, 603 N.Y.S.2d 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-brown-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack