Gordon v. Banque De Commerce De Petrograd

242 A.D. 842

This text of 242 A.D. 842 (Gordon v. Banque De Commerce De Petrograd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. Banque De Commerce De Petrograd, 242 A.D. 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

— Order denying plaintiff’s motion [843]*843for summary judgment reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion granted and the case remitted to the Special Term for an assessment of the plaintiff’s damages under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. We are of opinion that no triable issue of fact is presented. The allegations of the complaint and the plaintiff’s affidavits, supplemented by the exhibits, are not contradicted and they show an indebtedness by the defendant to the plaintiff as assignee of Banque Franeo-Japonaise. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-banque-de-commerce-de-petrograd-nyappdiv-1934.