Gordon R. Morris v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Gordon R. Morris v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

376 F.2d 845, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6513

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 4, 1967

Docket23795_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 376 F.2d 845 (Gordon R. Morris v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gordon R. Morris v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 376 F.2d 845, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6513 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gordon Morris, a state prisoner, appeals from a denial by the district court of a habeas corpus petition following a full and complete hearing. Appellant’s first contention that the prosecution suppressed evidence favorable to him is without merit. The record shows that the evidence was known by, and available to, the defense. As to the second contention that appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel, the district judge made explicit findings that the appointed attorneys diligently prepared and presented the defense, and exercised their best professional judgment in calling those witnesses whose testimony appeared,favorable, and in not presenting evidence- appearing harmful, to their client. There is ample evidence to support these findings which plainly are not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gordon Morris, a state prisoner, appeals from a denial by the district court of a habeas corpus petition following a full and complete hearing. Appellant’s first contention that the prosecution suppressed evidence favorable to him is without merit. The record shows that the evidence was known by, and available to, the defense. As to the second contention that appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel, the district judge made explicit findings that the appointed attorneys diligently prepared and presented the defense, and exercised their best professional judgment in calling those witnesses whose testimony appeared,favorable, and in not presenting evidence- appearing harmful, to their client. There is ample evidence to support these findings which plainly are not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

376 F.2d 845, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-r-morris-v-dr-george-j-beto-director-texas-department-of-ca5-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack