Gordon H. Mitchell v. Roy P. Parham and Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
345 F.2d 797, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5417
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed because of the lack of an appealable order. See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53; and Crutcher v. Joyce, 10 Cir., 134 F.2d 809, 813, 814.
On remand, if the plaintiff desires to amend his pleadings, he must do so within 10 days of the date of remand. If he fails to amend, the court should promptly enter a final order dismissing the action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gordon H. Mitchell v. Roy P. Parham and Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 345 F.2d 797, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5417 (10th Cir. 1965).
345 F.2d 797 (Gordon H. Mitchell v. Roy P. Parham and Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. John M. Reilly
373 F.2d 737 (Tenth Circuit, 1967)