Gordon H. Mitchell v. Roy P. Parham and Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
This text of 345 F.2d 797 (Gordon H. Mitchell v. Roy P. Parham and Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed because of the lack of an appealable order. See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53; and Crutcher v. Joyce, 10 Cir., 134 F.2d 809, 813, 814.
On remand, if the plaintiff desires to amend his pleadings, he must do so within 10 days of the date of remand. If he fails to amend, the court should promptly enter a final order dismissing the action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
345 F.2d 797, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-h-mitchell-v-roy-p-parham-and-oklahoma-alcoholic-beverage-control-ca10-1965.