Gordon, Gartrell & Harlin Reagan v. Adamson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gordon, Gartrell & Harlin Reagan v. Adamson

110 S.E. 232, 152 Ga. 271, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 71

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 17, 1921

DocketNo. 2518

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 232 (Gordon, Gartrell & Harlin Reagan v. Adamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gordon, Gartrell & Harlin Reagan v. Adamson, 110 S.E. 232, 152 Ga. 271, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 71 (Ga. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

George, J.

1. Where on the trial of a claim case there was no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, demanded a verdict for the claimant, it was not erroneous to direct a verdict for the claimant. Civil Code (1910), § 5926.

2. The assignments of error on the admissibility of testimony do not show cause for reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent because of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

1. Where on the trial of a claim case there was no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, demanded a verdict for the claimant, it was not erroneous to direct a verdict for the claimant. Civil Code (1910), § 5926.

2. The assignments of error on the admissibility of testimony do not show cause for reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent because of sickness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 S.E. 232, 152 Ga. 271, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-gartrell-harlin-reagan-v-adamson-ga-1921.