Gordon, Gartrell & Harlin Reagan v. Adamson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gordon, Gartrell & Harlin Reagan v. Adamson

110 S.E. 232, 152 Ga. 271, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 71

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1921·No. No. 2518·Published

Opinion

George, J.

1. Where on the trial of a claim case there was no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, demanded a verdict for the claimant, it was not erroneous to direct a verdict for the claimant. Civil Code (1910), § 5926.

2. The assignments of error on the admissibility of testimony do not show cause for reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent because of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

1. Where on the trial of a claim case there was no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, demanded a verdict for the claimant, it was not erroneous to direct a verdict for the claimant. Civil Code (1910), § 5926.

2. The assignments of error on the admissibility of testimony do not show cause for reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent because of sickness.

Gordon, Gartrell & Harlin Reagan v. Adamson, 110 S.E. 232, 152 Ga. 271, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 71 (Ga. 1921).

Pincite

110 S.E. 232 (Gordon, Gartrell & Harlin Reagan v. Adamson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.