Gordon Et Ux. v. Allen
This text of 1915 OK 1056 (Gordon Et Ux. v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This cause comes up on motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal. The record contains no notice of the time and place of signing and settling of case-made, and no waiver of the'same. It does not appear that the defendant in error was present or represented by counsel at the time case-made was signed and settled, and no amendments were suggested by him. It is well settled in this jurisdiction that the record must show either notice of the time and place of the signing and settling of a case-made, or a waiver of the same, otherwise the case-made is held to be a nullity. Harrison v. Penny, 28 Okla. 523, 114 Pac. 734; Ft. Smith & Western Ry. Co. v. State National Bank of Shawnee, 25 Okla. 128, 105 Pac. 647; Thompson v. Fulton, 29 Okla. 700, 119 Pac. 244; Wood v. Jones, 32 Okla. 640, 122 Pac. 678; Walcher v. Burford, 47 Okla. 98, 147 Pac. 774; Martindale & Deichman v. Shaha, 51 Okla. 670, 151 Pac. 1019.
We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1915 OK 1056, 153 P. 1176, 54 Okla. 543, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-et-ux-v-allen-okla-1915.