Gordon, Duncan Eric

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 27, 2021
DocketWR-92,088-01
StatusPublished

This text of Gordon, Duncan Eric (Gordon, Duncan Eric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon, Duncan Eric, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,088-01

EX PARTE DUNCAN ERIC GORDON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W12-61468-P(A) IN THE 203RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to

five years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal. Gordon v. State, No.

05-19-00658-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Jun. 10, 2020) (not designated for publication). Applicant

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he was prejudiced at sentencing due to counsel’s errors and that his

plea was involuntary because trial counsel did not advise him of the law of deadly weapons, the

availability of an affirmative defense, and the likelihood that the facts only supported a misdemeanor

assault prosecution. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. 2

Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to

respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out

in Article 11.07, § 3(d). It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects

to hold a hearing, it shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law resolving Applicant’s

allegations by determining whether counsel erred and, if so, whether Applicant was harmed under

the law applicable to each claim. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that

it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 27, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Ex parte Argent
393 S.W.3d 781 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gordon, Duncan Eric, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-duncan-eric-texcrimapp-2021.