Gordon & Cohen, Inc. v. Rose
211 A.D. 808
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order modified by striking out the second separate defense, and as so modified affirmed, -without costs. The exemption clause relied on in said defense does not expressly exempt the defendant Rose from liability for damages to his lessee if it be shown that such damage resulted from the negligence of said defendant, and no such exemption may be implied. (Lewis Co. v. Metropolitan Realty Co., 112 App. Div. 385, 387.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gordon & Cohen, Inc. v. Rose, 211 A.D. 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
211 A.D. 808 (Gordon & Cohen, Inc. v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Galante v. Hathaway Bakeries, Inc.
6 A.D.2d 142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Galante v. Hathaway Bakeries, Inc.
9 Misc. 2d 19 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)