Gordon Carroll Fisher v. Daniel K. Hagood, P. C. and Fitzpatrick Hagood Smith and UHL, Inc.
This text of Gordon Carroll Fisher v. Daniel K. Hagood, P. C. and Fitzpatrick Hagood Smith and UHL, Inc. (Gordon Carroll Fisher v. Daniel K. Hagood, P. C. and Fitzpatrick Hagood Smith and UHL, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered November 14, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00106-CV
GORDON CARROLL FISHER, Appellant
V.
DANIEL K. HAGOOD, P. C. AND FITZPATRICK HAGOOD SMITH AND UHL, INC., Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-05268-A
ORDER In their letter filed October 31, 2019, appellees stipulated that due to their settlement with
Gene E. Phillips on September 10, 2018, “[t]he effect of the settlement credit is that, as of
September 10, 2018, the amount of the arbitration award/judgment due and owing by Fisher is
reduced to $602,583.24, plus interest of $49.52 per day until paid.” At submission, the Court
asked appellant’s counsel if he agreed that amount was correct. Appellant’s counsel stated he
would review the matter and notify the Court whether he agreed to appellees’ stipulation. As of
the date of this order, appellant has not communicated with the Court regarding the stipulation.
Accordingly, the Court requests that appellant notify the Court by November 22, 2019 whether
he agrees to the stipulation. /s/ LANA MYERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gordon Carroll Fisher v. Daniel K. Hagood, P. C. and Fitzpatrick Hagood Smith and UHL, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-carroll-fisher-v-daniel-k-hagood-p-c-and-fitzpatrick-hagood-texapp-2019.