Gordon C. Bane v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 2, 2018
Docket05-17-00821-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gordon C. Bane v. State (Gordon C. Bane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon C. Bane v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Order entered August 2, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00821-CR

GORDON C. BANE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 297th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1464818D

ORDER Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on June 15, 2017. Although originally filed in the

Second Court of Appeals, the appeal was transferred to this Court on July 14, 2017 by the Texas

Supreme Court pursuant to a docket equalization order. TEX. GOV. CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West

2013. On November 3, 2017, William Reagan Wynn notified the Court that he had been

retained to represent appellant. We granted prior counsel’s motion to withdraw and recognized

Mr. Wynn as appellant’s counsel.

Appellant’s brief was originally due February 21, 2018. The Court granted a motion to

extend time to file the brief, making the brief due February 28, 2018. On March 2, 2018, we

notified Mr. Wynn by postcard that appellant’s brief was overdue. We instructed him to file the

brief and a motion to extend time to file the same within ten days or we would abate the appeal for a hearing. The brief was not filed, no motion was filed, and we received no communication

from Mr. Wynn. By order dated March 28, 2018, we abated the appeal for a hearing to

determine why no appellant’s brief had been filed.

On April 13, 2018, we received a supplemental reporter’s record of the abatement

hearing held that same day. In the hearing, the trial court found that appellant wanted to pursue

the appeal, that Mr. Wynn had not abandoned the appeal, and that Mr. Wynn needed additional

time to prepare the brief. Mr. Wynn told the trial court, “I know that I can file the brief within

30 days of today’s date.” We reinstated the appeal and ordered appellant’s brief due by June 22,

2018. To date, no brief has been filed. Mr. Wynn has not communicated with this Court.

We therefore ORDER retained counsel William Reagan Wynn to file appellant’s brief

BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 10, 2018. Mr. Wynn is cautioned that the Court will not entertain

any further motions from him for any extensions of time in this case. If Mr. Wynn does not file a

brief by 5:00 p.m. on August 10, 2018, the Court will initiate contempt proceedings against him

for the failure and refusal to obey the Court’s order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4). The Court

may also take such other actions as may be appropriate, including filing a grievance against Mr.

William Reagan Wynn and referring this matter to the State Bar of Texas Commission for

Lawyer Discipline for further proceedings.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to William Reagan

Wynn by certified mail at his address as shown in our records. We also DIRECT the Clerk to

send a copy of this order to the Honorable David Hagerman, Presiding Judge, 297th Judicial

District Court; to the Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office; and to appellant Gordon Bane,

TDCJ #02145207, Fort Stockton Unit, 1536 IH-10 East, Fort Stockton, TX 79735.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 73.001
Texas CP § 73.001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gordon C. Bane v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-c-bane-v-state-texapp-2018.