Gordo v. Saad

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gordo v. Saad

791 So. 2d 572, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11113, 2001 WL 883301

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2339·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Ins. Co., 330 So.2d 467 (Fla.1976). See Gordo v. Saad, 761 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(per curiam)(table).

The appellees’ motion for appellate attorney’s fees is granted against the appellant pursuant to the promissory note sued upon and against both the appellant and counsel under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2000). The cause is remanded for the trial court to determine the amount and apportionment of those fees.

[573]*573Affirmed. Motion for fees granted and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Ins. Co., 330 So.2d 467 (Fla.1976). See Gordo v. Saad, 761 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(per curiam)(table).

The appellees’ motion for appellate attorney’s fees is granted against the appellant pursuant to the promissory note sued upon and against both the appellant and counsel under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2000). The cause is remanded for the trial court to determine the amount and apportionment of those fees.

[573]*573Affirmed. Motion for fees granted and remanded.

Gordo v. Saad, 791 So. 2d 572, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11113, 2001 WL 883301 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

791 So. 2d 572 (Gordo v. Saad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related