Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gordo v. Saad

Gordo v. Saad

791 So. 2d 572, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11113, 2001 WL 883301
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 8, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-2339
StatusPublished

This text of 791 So. 2d 572 (Gordo v. Saad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordo v. Saad, 791 So. 2d 572, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11113, 2001 WL 883301 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Ins. Co., 330 So.2d 467 (Fla.1976). See Gordo v. Saad, 761 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(per curiam)(table).

The appellees’ motion for appellate attorney’s fees is granted against the appellant pursuant to the promissory note sued upon and against both the appellant and counsel under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2000). The cause is remanded for the trial court to determine the amount and apportionment of those fees.

[573]*573Affirmed. Motion for fees granted and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance Co.
330 So. 2d 467 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
791 So. 2d 572, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11113, 2001 WL 883301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordo-v-saad-fladistctapp-2001.