Gorden v. Garr

37 Ind. 463
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 37 Ind. 463 (Gorden v. Garr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gorden v. Garr, 37 Ind. 463 (Ind. 1871).

Opinion

Worden, C. J.

Action by the appellees against the appellant upon two promissory notes executed by the defendant to the plaintiffs. Judgment for plaintiffs.

There were two paragraphs in the complaint; one upon each of the notes; and copies of the notes were set out.

The only errors assigned are upon the rulings of the court in overruling motions to strike out, respectively, each paragraph of the complaint.

It is claimed here, against the ruling below, that the paragraphs are defective in not stating facts sufficient, etc.

A motion to strike out does not perform the office of a demurrer. Besides this, the respective paragraphs are good on demurrer. The question of time seems to be the important one in the cause.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Ind. 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorden-v-garr-ind-1871.