Gorbey v. United States

380 F. App'x 247
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2010·No. No. 09-7977·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael S. Gorbey appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation that Gorbey’s claims, which the court construed as being filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), be dismissed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gorbey v. United States, 2009 WL 3190451 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorbey v. United States, 380 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2010).

380 F. App'x 247 (Gorbey v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related