Gorbaty v. Brodsky

129 A.D.3d 1023, 12 N.Y.S.3d 235
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 2015
Docket2013-01871
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 129 A.D.3d 1023 (Gorbaty v. Brodsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gorbaty v. Brodsky, 129 A.D.3d 1023, 12 N.Y.S.3d 235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated January 4, 2013, which, inter alia, denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b for leave to extend the time to serve the summons and complaint upon a representative of the estate of the defendant *1024 and for leave to amend the complaint to add All Medical Care, LLP, as an additional defendant.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kangs County, for further proceedings to determine the date of the defendant’s death, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Kings County, shall file its report with all convenient speed.

While the order appealed from indicates that the defendant died prior to the commencement of the action, the record does not contain any evidence of the date of the defendant’s death. If the defendant died prior to the commencement of the action, the action would have been a legal nullity from its inception, the order appealed from would be a nullity, and this Court would have no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal (see Rivera v Bruchim, 103 AD3d 700, 700-701 [2013]; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg, 90 AD3d 713, 714 [2011]; Rocha v Figueiredo, 50 AD3d 876, 877 [2008]). Under these circumstances, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings to determine the date of the defendant’s death. The appeal will be held in abeyance pending our receipt of the Supreme Court’s report.

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

US Bank National Ass'n v. Cadeumag
2017 NY Slip Op 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Gorbaty v. Brodsky
142 A.D.3d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Krysa v. Estate of Qyra
136 A.D.3d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D.3d 1023, 12 N.Y.S.3d 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorbaty-v-brodsky-nyappdiv-2015.