Goranson v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
This text of 488 A.2d 849 (Goranson v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have reviewed the record in this matter and we conclude that the trial court did not err.
The plaintiff’s argument is directed specifically to the factual findings of the referee and the board of review of the unemployment compensation commission. The plaintiff conceded in her brief, however, that our review of the facts is limited to determining whether those factual conclusions were “reasonably and logically drawn.” Guevara v. Administrator, 172 Conn. 492, 496, 374 A.2d 1101 (1977), quoting Stapleton v. Administrator, 142 Conn. 160, 165, 112 A.2d 211 (1955), and citing Practice Book §§ 435, 445. We find that the conclusions of the referee and the board were both reasonable and logical.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 A.2d 849, 3 Conn. App. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goranson-v-administrator-unemployment-compensation-act-connappct-1985.