Goram v. Cable
17 N.Y.S. 662, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 272, 63 Hun 628, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 443
This text of 17 N.Y.S. 662 (Goram v. Cable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goram v. Cable, 17 N.Y.S. 662, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 272, 63 Hun 628, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 443 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
Opinion
We do not think it proved that deceased was intoxicated on the day of his death. We are not able to say, as a matter of law, that because two men have together consumed a pint of whisky in a day they must both be intoxicated. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 N.Y.S. 662, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 272, 63 Hun 628, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goram-v-cable-nysupct-1892.