Gopikrishna P. Doraiswamy v. Piping Technology & Products, Inc.
This text of Gopikrishna P. Doraiswamy v. Piping Technology & Products, Inc. (Gopikrishna P. Doraiswamy v. Piping Technology & Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 14-15-00007-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/1/2015 5:45:26 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS NO. 14-15-00007-CV HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/1/2015 5:45:26 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE GOPIKRISHNA P. DORAISWAMI, Clerk APPELLANT, v.
PIPING TECHNOLOGY & PRODUCTS, INC. APPELLEE.
APPELLANT’S SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF
Appellant Gopikrishna Doraiswamy files this Second Unopposed Motion
for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief under the authority of Texas Rule
of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) and would respectfully show the following:
1. This is an appeal from an order of the 333rd Judicial District Court
entered December 10, 2014, granting a temporary injunction in favor of Appellee.
2. Appellant’s opening brief is due to be filed on or before April 1,
2015.
3. This motion seeks an extension of time of 14 days, up to and
including April 15, 2015.
4. This is Appellant’s second request for an extension to file his brief.
5. On December 30, 2014, Appellant filed a Motion to Dissolve
Temporary Injunction with the trial court. That Motion was set for oral hearing in
the trial court on March 20, 2015. The oral hearing was not concluded on that date and was reset to March 31, 2015. The oral hearing concluded on March 31, 2015,
without a ruling from the bench. A ruling from the trial judge on the Motion to
Dissolve is expected shortly.
6. Appellant seeks the 10-day extension of the briefing deadline to allow
the trial court to rule on the pending Motion to Dissolve Temporary Injunction
prior to briefing in this matter as the outcome of that motion may be dispositive of
this appeal.
Therefore Appellant Gopikrishna Doraiswamy respectfully requests that the
Court extend the time for him to file his opening brief by 14 days, up to and
Respectfully submitted,
ELLISON & KELLER, P.C.
/s/Kelley M. Keller By: Tracey N. Ellison State Bar No.15054720 Kelley M. Keller State Bar No. 11198240 5120 Woodway, Suite 6019 Houston, Texas 77056 Telephone: 713-266-8200 Facsimile: 713-266-8201 kkeller@ellison-keller.com
Attorneys for Appellant
2 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I, Kelley M. Keller, certify that on March 31, 2015, I conferred in person with counsel for Appellee who stated that they do not oppose this request.
/s/Kelley M, Keller Kelley M. Keller
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A true and correct copy of this Appellant’s Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief has been forwarded to all counsel of record on March 31, 2015, via e-service as follows: William Helfand C. Larry Carbo III CHAMBERLAIN, HRDLICKA, WHITE, WILLIAMS & AUGHTRY 1200 Smith Street, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: 713-654-9630 Facsimile: 713-658-2553
Attorneys for Appellee Piping Technology & Products, Inc.
/s/Kelley M. Keller Kelley M. Keller
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gopikrishna P. Doraiswamy v. Piping Technology & Products, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gopikrishna-p-doraiswamy-v-piping-technology-products-inc-texapp-2015.