GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC v. Kennedy

CourtDistrict Court, D. South Carolina
DecidedMarch 6, 2025
Docket2:22-cv-03932
StatusUnknown

This text of GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC v. Kennedy (GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC v. Kennedy, (D.S.C. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, ) LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 2:22-cv-03932-DCN vs. ) ) ORDER ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., in his official ) capacity as Secretary, United States ) Department of Health and Human Services, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________) In this matter, plaintiff Goose Creek Physical Medicine, LLC (“GCPM”) seeks judicial review of an alleged Medicare overpayment. See generally ECF No. 24, Amend. Compl. In short, GCPM alleges that it availed itself of the Medicare appellate process, and that on January 18, 2021, the Administrative Law Judge (the “ALJ”) issued a partially favorable decision and ordered that GCPM’s overpayment amount be recalculated. Id. ¶¶ 242–243. GCPM further alleges that, on February 18, 2022, Palmetto GBA, LLC (“Palmetto”), a Medicare Administrative Contractor, sent GCPM a letter indicating that, in light of the ALJ’s decision, GCPM’s overpayment amount had been reduced, and Palmetto later issued GCPM a refund check based on that reduction. Id. ¶¶ 246, 249. However, GCPM contends that Palmetto did not provide documentation supporting how it determined the refund amount. Id. ¶¶ 249–53. Thus, in this court, GCPM filed both a direct appeal of the ALJ’s decision and non-direct appeal claims pursuant to Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., 529 U.S. 1 (2000), based largely on Palmetto’s alleged failure to provide an accounting to support the refund amount. See Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 257–92; see also ECF No. 80 (GCPM’s briefing explaining the basis of its claims brought pursuant to Illinois Council). During a hearing on August 27, 2024, the court ordered the Secretary1 to file the administrative record in this case under seal. ECF No. 78. The court ORDERS that Secretary Kennedy make this filing by no later than 5 p.m. on Thursday, March 13, 2025.

Additionally, GCPM references various documents in its amended complaint in support of its non-direct appeal claims, including the letter Palmetto sent GCPM on February 18, 2022, and subsequent correspondences between GCPM and Palmetto in June 2022. Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 246, 249–253. However, because these documents apparently originated after the ALJ’s decision, GCPM does not provide a citation for these documents in the administrative record. See id. The court has authority to develop an evidentiary record when reviewing claims brought pursuant to Illinois Council, 529 U.S. at 24. Therefore, the court ORDERS that GCPM file under seal the documents referenced in its amended complaint related to Palmetto’s alleged failure to support its

refund determination by no later than 5 p.m. on Thursday, March 13, 2025.

1 At the time of that hearing, the defendant in this case was Secretary Xavier Becerra. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (“Secretary Kennedy”) was sown in as Secretary of Health and Human Services on February 13, 2025. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), he is substituted as the defendant in this case. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

DAVID C. NORTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE March 6, 2025 Charleston, South Carolina

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC v. Kennedy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goose-creek-physical-medicine-llc-v-kennedy-scd-2025.