Goosby v. United States Air Force

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided February 26, 2024·No. 3:21-cv-00340·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

WILLIAM GOOSBY, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:21-cv-340 : v. : Judge Thomas M. Rose : Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. FRANK KENDALL, SECRETARY, UNITED : STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR : FORCE, : : Defendant. : ______________________________________________________________________________

ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION OF PARTIES FOR STAY OF CALENDAR DATES (DOC. NO. 26) ______________________________________________________________________________

This matter is before the Court on Joint Motion of Parties for Stay of Calendar Dates (“Motion”). (Doc. No. 26.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and S.D. Ohio Local Rule 6.1(b), and the Court’s inherent authority to stay proceedings, Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254, 57 S. Ct. 163, 166 (1936), the Court GRANTS the Motion and STAYS FOR 90 DAYS all deadlines and calendar dates, except deadlines and calendar dates that apply to an anticipated Court- facilitated settlement conference. Should the Parties’ attempt at extrajudicial resolution be unsuccessful, then the Parties are ORDERED to file a joint motion to lift stay with a proposed calendar for dispositive motion briefing, trial, and any other related deadlines within seven (7) days of any unsuccessful mediation or settlement conference. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, February 26, 2024. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goosby v. United States Air Force, (S.D. Ohio 2024).

Goosby v. United States Air Force (Goosby v. United States Air Force) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (Supreme Court, 1936)