Goosby v. United States Air Force
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
WILLIAM GOOSBY, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:21-cv-340 : v. : Judge Thomas M. Rose : Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. FRANK KENDALL, SECRETARY, UNITED : STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR : FORCE, : : Defendant. : ______________________________________________________________________________
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION OF PARTIES FOR STAY OF CALENDAR DATES (DOC. NO. 26) ______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on Joint Motion of Parties for Stay of Calendar Dates (“Motion”). (Doc. No. 26.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and S.D. Ohio Local Rule 6.1(b), and the Court’s inherent authority to stay proceedings, Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254, 57 S. Ct. 163, 166 (1936), the Court GRANTS the Motion and STAYS FOR 90 DAYS all deadlines and calendar dates, except deadlines and calendar dates that apply to an anticipated Court- facilitated settlement conference. Should the Parties’ attempt at extrajudicial resolution be unsuccessful, then the Parties are ORDERED to file a joint motion to lift stay with a proposed calendar for dispositive motion briefing, trial, and any other related deadlines within seven (7) days of any unsuccessful mediation or settlement conference. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, February 26, 2024. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goosby v. United States Air Force (Goosby v. United States Air Force) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.