Goosby v. Goosby

614 So. 2d 692, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2989, 1993 WL 72045
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1862
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 614 So. 2d 692 (Goosby v. Goosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goosby v. Goosby, 614 So. 2d 692, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2989, 1993 WL 72045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Larry Goosby, challenges - a final judgment of dissolution of marriage on two grounds. We find no error in the trial judge not appointing counsel to represent Goosby, and we affirm on that point. We do find, however, that the final order by the trial judge is devoid of certain findings necessary to facilitate meaningful appellate review or to comply with specific statutory requirements concerning equitable distribution. See § 61.075(3), Fla.Stat. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court to make further findings related to distribution of assets including pension benefits. See Walsh v. Walsh, 600 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMullan v. McMullan
710 So. 2d 1045 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 692, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2989, 1993 WL 72045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goosby-v-goosby-fladistctapp-1993.