Goosby v. Goosby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goosby v. Goosby

614 So. 2d 692, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2989, 1993 WL 72045

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 16, 1993·No. No. 92-1862·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Larry Goosby, challenges - a final judgment of dissolution of marriage on two grounds. We find no error in the trial judge not appointing counsel to represent Goosby, and we affirm on that point. We do find, however, that the final order by the trial judge is devoid of certain findings necessary to facilitate meaningful appellate review or to comply with specific statutory requirements concerning equitable distribution. See § 61.075(3), Fla.Stat. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court to make further findings related to distribution of assets including pension benefits. See Walsh v. Walsh, 600 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Larry Goosby, challenges - a final judgment of dissolution of marriage on two grounds. We find no error in the trial judge not appointing counsel to represent Goosby, and we affirm on that point. We do find, however, that the final order by the trial judge is devoid of certain findings necessary to facilitate meaningful appellate review or to comply with specific statutory requirements concerning equitable distribution. See § 61.075(3), Fla.Stat. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court to make further findings related to distribution of assets including pension benefits. See Walsh v. Walsh, 600 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Goosby v. Goosby, 614 So. 2d 692, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2989, 1993 WL 72045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

614 So. 2d 692 (Goosby v. Goosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related