Goosby, Richard

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 2, 2015
DocketWR-79,522-02
StatusPublished

This text of Goosby, Richard (Goosby, Richard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goosby, Richard, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

May 26, 2015 Richacd Goosby c/0 9601 SPUR 591 (NOT A DOMOCILE) Amacillo, Texas Republic [neac 79107-9606] .

To: Texas Couct of Cciminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308, CAPITOL STATION Austin, Texas 78711

Re: WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Deac CLeek;

Enclosed please find the above named Relator-'s Ociqinal Application foe Wcit of Mandamus to be filed in this couct as soon as possible. Thank you in advance foe youc time in this mattec and do have a pleasent day /

RECEIVED IN encl. .• COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAlS RG/AA / JUN 02 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk .t

·•.... I'• •• ,'1'' Cause No. 1315052-3

[RICHI\RD GOOSBY] § In the 230th Judicial Distcic: TDCJ # f/TlJJJ Gz ], Co'..lct of Harri.3 Coun:y, Texas Relatot:'. §

v. §

HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK: § CHRIS DAN'IBL IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPI\CITY, § R~..;pondent § PL!HNTIFF' S ORIGLN.;L APPLICZ\TION FOR \"JRI'i' OF MZ\NDI\MUS '1'0 I'H~ ~-fOi\101\BLE JUDGE OF S~ID COURT: COMES NO~v, [RICtl\.=m GOOSBY], Rela~or, pro se in ti.1e -tr)OV:?-3tyled and n:.lm- bered cade of Ccitninal Pcocedur:-~, and would sho1v the Cour': th:: follo,·li.ng: r.· RELATOR 1.01 [ RICHA~D GOOSBY], TDCJ #L 111.1.:1. 3.c,]·l.. ·"-~ an offe.1der i.nc~rc:::rated in the Texas Dep'lri:ment of Cr:-i.mi~B.l Justice and i.3_a~pe-:lring J?CO d2,.who can be loc.'lted at . 9601 SPU~ 591, PotteR County, .Texa3 79107-9606. 1.02 .{ela::oc has ex;vmst~d his cetnedie..:; and ;.1as no other adequat.r:: cemedy a<: 1'-:i\v. 1.03 Toa -'iCt sough~ to be co,np::lbd is mini ::teri.al, no:: di~ccetionacy in nature. TCCrP :~.r:-t. 11.07 Section 3(c) cequir:-es Res9ondent ::o .Lt1f•V?diate1y ':can.;:;,,1it to ti1a Court of Cciminal Appeals a co::_>y of th~ 1\p-?lication foe writ of habea:;; cocpus, any an3wecs filed, and a certificat~ ceciting toe date U-?On which that findi119 was H1aClr::, i·f tha convic':ing court d~cid23

::hat thece ·Jt::'e no i.ss le:: ':o b.= C230lved. No CO-?Y of t!1e application foe writ of habe-:1.:> cor:pus, any an:;;>v'=C3 fi12d, and a cectifica::.:: r?citing t:y~

d:.·.:.e up01.1 which that finding wa.s mad2 have beet1 ::.can::;,Hit::r::d. to t;n co·1ct ' of Criminal Appei:-\ls. Had such docum~nts been ':cansrnittad to the Court of Cciminal Appe1L; by Res~ondent ~3 cequic2d by 3':a':ute, Re1a~oc would have rgceived noticr:: from ':ha Cour-t of Criinal 1\pp.::aL;. II. RESPONDE:NT 2.01 Re:;pondent, ca~rs D\NIEL, in his C'ip1city a.s District Clerk of Hacci.s County, Texas has a ministaci~l duty to rec2ive and fila all papers in a criminal

1 pc;oceeding, and perform all other dutie:3 i.nposad on th~ clerk by law pursuant to TCCcP Ac':.. 2.21, and is responsible under 11.07 sec 3(c) to imil1ediately tr·:msmit to l:he Couct of Cci.minr.tl i\pt=J~al3 a copy of the a9pHca':ion foe writ of habeas corpus, any an.sw-:rs fil:d, and :t certificate reciting the date upon which that finding was "lade· i f the convicting couct decide3. tn:tt l:hec~

are no i3sues to be resolved. CrlCis DaniGl, Di.strict Cl~rk, Hacris County may be 3ecved at his .place of bu3ine,::;s at P.O. Jox 4651, Hous:on,. Texa;;; 77210-4651. III. VIOLI\TION OF ARTICLE 11.07 OF THE .TEXI\S CODE QF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.01 The Respondent violated ll.rticle 11.07 Section 3(c) of th~ Texa..:; Code of Cciminal Procedm·e by failing to provide a copy of ':h-: 3.pplic~tion for wdt of h:'lbea:; co::pu3, any answerd filed, and 01 c2ctificat-~ reci::ing th1t ti1e date upon wh 'i.ci1 that findii1g W'iS made :o the Couct of Cciwindl '-\.ppeaL;; within th::! t i.me pre~ccibed by law and within a rea.:mnable time from the da':-~ on ,.,1-}ich the doc ~uent3 wece cequest~d to b= transmitted. 3.02 Reque.:>t.r.; foe the tcansmit:tal of th: application foe the writ of habeas cocpu.:;, any an.:>ivecs filed, and a certificate '='eciting the dat: upon which that finding W3'-;; ttHde by Relata:- to CHRIS DANL:!L,. Distdct Cle;:-k, Haec is Co'Jnty 1 by certified r.~ai.led lettec3 dated 11/24/2014; 04/16/2015; pursuant to Acticle 11.07 .seci:ion 3(c) of the CodP. of Cciminal Pcocedure. Tcue .:1nd Correct copie.:; of the above letter.3 ace attached he:eto ::~..3 ::::xhibi':.s "Z\" and "3" and are incorpor- 'i::ed by c~fet:'ence hacein for all ;:mcposes. 3.03 To da'::e, ~ela':oc has t'ec~..~ived no cespons~ ftom Re::3~)ondent regarding Relator 's req•.1est foe tcansmi tt01l of a copy of th~ application fo;:.· wei.': of hc:1o::'l3 corpu3, any answer.:; fil~d,, Cl.nd a cectificat.e r<::!ci::ing the date UtJon which thdt• finding was made to the Court of Criminal Appeals. 3.04 A:.:; i::; cle01r f :-om Reb tor's let':.ecs, Relator. ha.s t:'ei?e?.tedly put Respondent On • n ·"~~C"' ...1..,..'• .,.. t-h"-:- - ...... _ R·"l"l-O.- J.. ~~- --. 1.. '""'"":..:,. .'J·.--.l"io..' '"n·"' t-v-a·l·l·'\tll···t-=-l ..,.l _. ~ l . ._ -~..4 -L. or:-="' .!:t. ,~ooy -".._ · o·r- .L r·n,.·:=-pp·l;~,.,., -1 .._.A. ...;o··l L\,.o.;;r.-'- '

fo;:- wcit of i1::1beas cocpus, any .ans·.vecs filed, and a cet:'tificat.~ reciting th~ d-i:e upon which that finding was made to the C:::ourt of Criminal Appeals and that such records are required by the Court of Criminal Appeals to act on Rel:lto~·'::; writ of Habeas Corpus. Relator ha·::l gone, well beyond any require- m~n': or obl iga=.ions impo3ed upon hiin by the Texas Code of Criminal ProC·'?- ~ . d'Jre. In contest to Relatot:''s effot'ts,. R~s.;:>ondent h1.,; wholly failed to comply with the Texas Code ofCri.minal Procedure, 1\cticle 11.07 Section. 3(c), i.3 ac:ing in b~d faith, :'3.nd has alao faiL~d to afford r-elator the

2 professional and common courtesy of any written responses to his cor-res- pondence and ~equest. 3.05 Article 11.07 Section 3{c) clearly states that "[i]f the convicting court decides that ·there ~re no such issues, the clerk shall immediately trans- mit [ emphasi.3 added] to the Court of Criminal Appeals a copy of the appli- cation, any answ8rs filed, and a certific~te reciting th= ddte upon whi.cl1 that finding was miide. Failure ·Of the court to ac': within the allowed 20 days shall cotl3dtutt-: such a finding." Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 1.\rticle 11.07Sec. 3{c). Resi?ondent is in violation of tnis procedure, ministerial duties; and thus the laws of this stai::. IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE,.PREMIS'!:S CONSIDERt:D, Relator, [RICHARD GOOSBY], pro p2r, resp:ctfully request a finding that tn: Respondent did not transmit doc;lltH:mts I. .

to ~ne Court of Cciminal Ap?e·'lls within a reasonable .time after the date they wee? requested and that Relator his litigation in good faith and h~s substan- tially pr:!vailed. Rel:=ttor ~1ray.s fo~ an order directing Res9ondent. to transmit a co;;>y of t.he-:it)plica::.ion for writ of habeas corpu0, any answers filed, and a I certificate reciting the date upon which that finding was made to th: Court of Criminal AppeaL; a3 directed in Article 11.07 Section 3(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and as cequested in Relato~'s letters (Exhibits "A", & "B")·. AFFIDAVIT THE ST~T8 OF TEXT.\S § § / COU~TY OF POTTER § I swear under oath th3.t the facts and all~gationsin th.? above APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF Mi\NDAMUS are true and correct.

S[GN8D UNDER OATH '3~FO~E ME, on this the day of I 2015.

Notary Public in and foe the STATE OF T~X\S UNSWORN DECL!-\RATION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Goosby, Richard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goosby-richard-texapp-2015.