Goolsby v. State

132 S.E. 245, 35 Ga. App. 167
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 2, 1926
Docket16936
StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 245 (Goolsby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goolsby v. State, 132 S.E. 245, 35 Ga. App. 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. He did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 245, 35 Ga. App. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goolsby-v-state-gactapp-1926.