Goolsby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goolsby v. State

860 So. 2d 991, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15642, 2003 WL 22358140

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 17, 2003

DocketNo. 5D02-2936

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 860 So. 2d 991 (Goolsby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goolsby v. State, 860 So. 2d 991, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15642, 2003 WL 22358140 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Phillip Alexander Goolsby appeals the denial of his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm because no error has been shown. We write only to point out that a defendant’s speedy trial rights with respect to charges in one jurisdiction are not implicated when the defendant is being held pending a trial in another jurisdiction. See Hill v. Wainwright, 617 F.2d 375, n. 1 (5th Cir.1980) (holding that the state could not under any circumstances be charged for the delay during the period the defendant was held after his arrest for and until his conviction on felony charges in another jurisdiction).

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W. and ORFINGER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, J.

Phillip Alexander Goolsby appeals the denial of his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm because no error has been shown. We write only to point out that a defendant’s speedy trial rights with respect to charges in one jurisdiction are not implicated when the defendant is being held pending a trial in another jurisdiction. See Hill v. Wainwright, 617 F.2d 375, n. 1 (5th Cir.1980) (holding that the state could not under any circumstances be charged for the delay during the period the defendant was held after his arrest for and until his conviction on felony charges in another jurisdiction).

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W. and ORFINGER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

860 So. 2d 991, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15642, 2003 WL 22358140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goolsby-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack