Goohya v. MARY A. WALSH-TOZER
784 N.E.2d 74, 99 N.Y.2d 551, 754 N.Y.S.2d 201, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3830
This text of 784 N.E.2d 74 (Goohya v. MARY A. WALSH-TOZER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goohya v. MARY A. WALSH-TOZER, 784 N.E.2d 74, 99 N.Y.2d 551, 754 N.Y.S.2d 201, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3830 (N.Y. 2002).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely. The prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (see Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 73, at 452 [3d ed]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
784 N.E.2d 74, 99 N.Y.2d 551, 754 N.Y.S.2d 201, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goohya-v-mary-a-walsh-tozer-ny-2002.