Goohya v. MARY A. WALSH-TOZER
784 N.E.2d 74, 99 N.Y.2d 551, 754 N.Y.S.2d 201, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3830
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely. The prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (see Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 73, at 452 [3d ed]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goohya v. MARY A. WALSH-TOZER, 784 N.E.2d 74, 99 N.Y.2d 551, 754 N.Y.S.2d 201, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3830 (N.Y. 2002).
784 N.E.2d 74 (Goohya v. MARY A. WALSH-TOZER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.