Googins v. Googins
25 N.E. 833, 152 Mass. 533, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 122
Opinion
At the time when the marriage between these parties was solemnized within this Commonwealth, the libellee was prohibited by statute from marrying within the Commonwealth. Pub. Sts. c. 146, § 22.
The marriage was therefore void. White v. White, 105 Mass. 325. Thompson v. Thompson, 114 Mass. 566. Cook v. Cook, 144 Mass. 163. Decree for the libellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Googins v. Googins, 25 N.E. 833, 152 Mass. 533, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 122 (Mass. 1890).
25 N.E. 833 (Googins v. Googins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tozier v. Haverhill & Amesbury Street Railway Co.
72 N.E. 953 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)