Goodykoontz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goodykoontz v. State

830 So. 2d 965, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17497, 2002 WL 31641550

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 25, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-4850

StatusPublished

This text of 830 So. 2d 965 (Goodykoontz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodykoontz v. State, 830 So. 2d 965, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17497, 2002 WL 31641550 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari, Diana Lynn Goodykoontz seeks review of a non-final order denying her motion seeking a declaration of indigence. Petitioner has not demonstrated that no remedy will be available on direct appeal or that the trial court violated a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250, 252 (Fla.1988). The petition is therefore DENIED.

BOOTH, BENTON and Van NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari, Diana Lynn Goodykoontz seeks review of a non-final order denying her motion seeking a declaration of indigence. Petitioner has not demonstrated that no remedy will be available on direct appeal or that the trial court violated a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250, 252 (Fla.1988). The petition is therefore DENIED.

BOOTH, BENTON and Van NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

830 So. 2d 965, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17497, 2002 WL 31641550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodykoontz-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack