Goodyear v. McBurney
This text of 10 F. Cas. 699 (Goodyear v. McBurney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The suit is properly brought in the name of the pat-entee, in behalf of the party holding a license to use.
There has been much neglect and delay in this proceeding, on the part of Greacen; but I cannot say that he shall be debarred from contesting in the usual way the matters set up in the plea. The motion is granted, on payment of the costs of opposing it, and of putting in a rejoinder to the replication.
[For other cases involving this patent, see note to Goodyear v. Central It. Co., Case No. 5,563.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F. Cas. 699, 3 Blatchf. 32, 1853 U.S. App. LEXIS 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodyear-v-mcburney-circtsdny-1853.