Goodyear v. McBurney

10 F. Cas. 699, 3 Blatchf. 32, 1853 U.S. App. LEXIS 693
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedSeptember 12, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 F. Cas. 699 (Goodyear v. McBurney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodyear v. McBurney, 10 F. Cas. 699, 3 Blatchf. 32, 1853 U.S. App. LEXIS 693 (circtsdny 1853).

Opinion

■ NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The suit is properly brought in the name of the pat-entee, in behalf of the party holding a license to use.

There has been much neglect and delay in this proceeding, on the part of Greacen; but I cannot say that he shall be debarred from contesting in the usual way the matters set up in the plea. The motion is granted, on payment of the costs of opposing it, and of putting in a rejoinder to the replication.

[For other cases involving this patent, see note to Goodyear v. Central It. Co., Case No. 5,563.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Continental Jewell Filtration Co. v. City of Sullivan
111 F. 179 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1901)
Brush Electric Co. v. Electric Imp. Co.
49 F. 73 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1892)
Brush-Swan Electric Light Co. v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co.
48 F. 224 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 F. Cas. 699, 3 Blatchf. 32, 1853 U.S. App. LEXIS 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodyear-v-mcburney-circtsdny-1853.