Goodyear v. Commercial Fire Insurance

68 N.Y.S. 756, 58 A.D. 611
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 N.Y.S. 756 (Goodyear v. Commercial Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodyear v. Commercial Fire Insurance, 68 N.Y.S. 756, 58 A.D. 611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

RUMSEY, J.

This motion was granted, and the writ of attachment vacated, upon the ground that the action was prematurely brought. Upon motions for relief of this kind, the merits of the action will not usually be considered, and, unless it is certain that the complaint is so defective that the plaintiffs cannot recover in the action, the motion will be denied, and the writ of attachment continued until the final determination of the action. Furbush v. Nye, 17 App. Div. 325, 45 N. Y. Supp. 214; Investment Co. v. Moore, 35 App. Div. 421, 54 N. Y. Supp. 787. The application of this rule requires that this order should be reversed, and the motion to vacate the attachment denied.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aspell Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Meeker
54 Misc. 55 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1907)
Jones v. Hygienic Soap Granulator Co.
110 A.D. 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 N.Y.S. 756, 58 A.D. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodyear-v-commercial-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-1901.