Goodyear v. Commercial Fire Insurance

68 N.Y.S. 756, 58 A.D. 611
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1901·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

RUMSEY, J.

This motion was granted, and the writ of attachment vacated, upon the ground that the action was prematurely brought. Upon motions for relief of this kind, the merits of the action will not usually be considered, and, unless it is certain that the complaint is so defective that the plaintiffs cannot recover in the action, the motion will be denied, and the writ of attachment continued until the final determination of the action. Furbush v. Nye, 17 App. Div. 325, 45 N. Y. Supp. 214; Investment Co. v. Moore, 35 App. Div. 421, 54 N. Y. Supp. 787. The application of this rule requires that this order should be reversed, and the motion to vacate the attachment denied.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodyear v. Commercial Fire Insurance, 68 N.Y.S. 756, 58 A.D. 611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

68 N.Y.S. 756 (Goodyear v. Commercial Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aspell Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Meeker
54 Misc. 55 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1907)
Jones v. Hygienic Soap Granulator Co.
110 A.D. 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)