Goodyear v. Catoe

Fourth Circuit

Goodyear v. Catoe

32 F. App'x 691

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2002·No. No. 01-7962·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Paul Goodyear appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goodyear v. Catoe, CA-01-20-BD (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2001; entered Oct. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Paul Goodyear appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goodyear v. Catoe, CA-01-20-BD (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2001; entered Oct. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Goodyear v. Catoe, 32 F. App'x 691 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

32 F. App'x 691 (Goodyear v. Catoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related