Goodwin v. Wertheimer

The Superior Court of New York City

Goodwin v. Wertheimer

17 Jones & S. 540

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedDecember 3, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Jones & S. 540 (Goodwin v. Wertheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodwin v. Wertheimer, 17 Jones & S. 540 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Freedman, J., wrote: “As to the merits this court has already decided (49 Super. Ct. 101) that the plaintiffs cannot recover against the defendant Wertheimer except upon proof of a demand of the property and a refusal by Wertheimer to comply. Upon the trial now under review the plaintiffs failed to supply this proof and hence the complaint was properly dismissed as to Wertheimer.” O’Gorman, J., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, J., wrote: “As to the merits this court has already decided (49 Super. Ct. 101) that the plaintiffs cannot recover against the defendant Wertheimer except upon proof of a demand of the property and a refusal by Wertheimer to comply. Upon the trial now under review the plaintiffs failed to supply this proof and hence the complaint was properly dismissed as to Wertheimer.” O’Gorman, J., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs. '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Jones & S. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-wertheimer-nysuperctnyc-1883.