Goodwin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Goodwin v. State

233 S.W.3d 234, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1331, 2007 WL 2702351

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 18, 2007

DocketED 89016

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 S.W.3d 234 (Goodwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodwin v. State, 233 S.W.3d 234, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1331, 2007 WL 2702351 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Goodwin appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Goodwin argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in cross-examining three of the State’s witnesses. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI