Goodwin v. State

450 So. 2d 582, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13432
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 1984
DocketNo. 83-170
StatusPublished

This text of 450 So. 2d 582 (Goodwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodwin v. State, 450 So. 2d 582, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13432 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the search which emanated from the same warrant as was determined to be defective in Blue v. State, 441 So.2d 165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) was illegal. Nonetheless, the state now argues for the first time that the defendant Goodwin did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the nursery and therefore has no standing to challenge the illegal search. Accordingly, following Morales v. State, 407 So.2d 321, 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) and State v. Doyle, 409 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), we remand to the trial court to afford the defendant the opportunity to establish that the unlawful search invaded his reasonable expectation of privacy.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morales v. State
407 So. 2d 321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Doyle
409 So. 2d 1168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Blue v. State
441 So. 2d 165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 So. 2d 582, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.