Goodwin v. Shapiro

545 F. Supp. 826, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17821
CourtDistrict Court, D. New Jersey
DecidedAugust 2, 1982
DocketCiv. A. 80-2828
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 545 F. Supp. 826 (Goodwin v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodwin v. Shapiro, 545 F. Supp. 826, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17821 (D.N.J. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION

STERN, District Judge.

This action was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by sixteen past and present patients at the Essex County Hospital Center in Cedar Grove, New Jersey, a psychiatric hospital run by Essex County, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. The named defendants were Peter Shapiro, the Essex County Executive; Michael P. Duffy, Director of the Essex County Hospital Center; David Paschal, Acting Director of the Essex County Department of Health and Rehabilitation; Theresa Bie-lawski, M.D., Acting Medical Director of the Essex County Hospital Center; and Michael Woodman, Director of the Department of Social Services at Essex County Hospital Center. 1

Plaintiffs sought declaratory relief and an injunction restraining defendants from maintaining conditions and pursuing policies which they alleged deprived them of their right to meaningful treatment; subjected them to inhumane and unsafe environmental factors, such as physical abuse and overcrowded ward conditions; deprived them of effective medical care; confined them in unduly restrictive ward settings; deprived them of their fundamental personal and civil rights; and denied them access to their own funds. Plaintiffs contended that these alleged conditions and policies deprived them of their rights under the *827 First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution as well as various laws and statutes of the United States and the State of New Jersey.

On February 25, 1981, upon motion of plaintiffs and after hearing oral argument, the Court entered an Order certifying this action as a class action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2), with the class consisting of all past, present, and future patients at the Essex County Hospital Center.

On July 20,1981, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement resolving all of the matters raised by the lawsuit. After a hearing on that same date, the Court entered an Order approving the settlement and dismissing the complaint with prejudice. As part of the settlement, the parties agreed that its terms should be monitored by a Court-appointed Master and the Court appointed John J. Barry, P.C., Gateway One, Newark, New Jersey, an attorney of the Bar of the State of New Jersey, to serve in that capacity. 2

The parties have requested that the Court issue this opinion so that the terms of the stipulation may be published. The Court is pleased to comply with this request, especially in view of the far-reaching and comprehensive provisions of the agreement. Indeed, the Court wishes to commend counsel for both parties for reaching an agreement that is both fair and equitable and which will undoubtedly be of enormous benefit to the patients at the Essex County Hospital Center.

The text of the Stipulation of Settlement is therefore set forth as follows:

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

WHEREAS, litigation is pending between the Parties relating to the constitutional and statutory rights of the Plaintiff class; and

WHEREAS, subsequent to the institution of this litigation the Parties to this Agreement have had an opportunity to explore fully the facts and circumstances which relate to the matter; and

WHEREAS, upon consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances the parties desire to reach an amicable resolution of this litigation; and

WHEREAS, negotiations between the parties have now resulted in their reaching such an agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows herein in the Stipulation Agreement attached hereto.

ITEM PAGE
Definitions...............................828
I. Safety & Maintenance........................828
Habitability.............................829
Bathrooms and Lavatories.................829
II. Physical & Psychological Environment...........830
Resident Unit..........................830
Day Room..............................830
Dining Facilities.........................830
III. Treatment.................................830
Admissions.............................830
Acute Psychiatric Care and Intervention.....832
Personal Care Unit.......................833
Socialization Service Unit..................833
Community Oriented Unit.................834
Medical Services.........................834
Outreach Unit...........................835
Adolescent Unit.........................835
General Services.......................836
Activities Therapy......................836
Individualized Treatment Plans...........836
IV. Token Economy and Behavior Modification Pro-
gram ....................................840
V. Staffing...................................840
Staff to Patient Ratio Per Unit.............840
Staffing Ratios Per Work Shift.............841
Qualified Staff to Provide Adequate Services .. 842 Staff (In-Service Training).................843
VI. Quality Control and Program Evaluation.........843
VII. Nutritional Standards and Diets................843
VIII. Pharmaceutical Services......................844
IX. Medical Records.............................844
X. Patients Discharged Pending Placement..........844
XI. Miscellaneous Provisions................-......844
Psychotropic Medication for Involuntarily Committed Patients........................845
Patients Funds..........................845
Allegations of Physical Abuse...............846
Levels of Supervision.....................847
XII. Monitoring Agreement.......................849

*828

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Shapiro
484 A.2d 1282 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 F. Supp. 826, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-shapiro-njd-1982.