Goodwin v. Schott
28 A. 356, 159 Pa. 552, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 894
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 29, 1894·No. Appeals, Nos. 100 and 101·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Assuming, as we must in cases of this class, that the defendant is prepared to substantiate, by competent evidence, the material facts averred in his affidavit of defence, there was no error in discharging plaintiff’s rule for judgment. The affidavit of defence is quite sufficient to entitle the defendant to a trial by
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goodwin v. Schott, 28 A. 356, 159 Pa. 552, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 894 (Pa. 1894).
28 A. 356 (Goodwin v. Schott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rothermel v. Phillips
141 A. 241 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Augusto v. Romano
42 Pa. Super. 19 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Carrara Paint Agency Co. v. Naylor
32 Pa. Super. 329 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)