Goodwin v. Schott
28 A. 356, 159 Pa. 552, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 894
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 29, 1894
DocketAppeals, Nos. 100 and 101
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 28 A. 356 (Goodwin v. Schott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goodwin v. Schott, 28 A. 356, 159 Pa. 552, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 894 (Pa. 1894).
Opinion
Assuming, as we must in cases of this class, that the defendant is prepared to substantiate, by competent evidence, the material facts averred in his affidavit of defence, there was no error in discharging plaintiff’s rule for judgment. The affidavit of defence is quite sufficient to entitle the defendant to a trial by
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rothermel v. Phillips
141 A. 241 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Augusto v. Romano
42 Pa. Super. 19 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Carrara Paint Agency Co. v. Naylor
32 Pa. Super. 329 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 A. 356, 159 Pa. 552, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-schott-pa-1894.