Goodwin v. Lee

71 A.D.2d 1013, 420 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13357

This text of 71 A.D.2d 1013 (Goodwin v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodwin v. Lee, 71 A.D.2d 1013, 420 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

In a negligence action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries incurred as the result of a fall down an elevator shaft, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 23, 1978, as is in favor of defendants Helen R. Lee, doing business as Lee Associates, Lee Associates and Regency Industries, Inc., upon a jury verdict. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The trial court did not err in refusing to charge that contributory negligence was not a defense to this action. It has been held that under section 255 of the Labor Law, the defense of contributory negligence is a proper issue for the jury’s determination (see Hente v Shercoop Corp., 289 NY 140). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hente v. Shercoop Corporation
44 N.E.2d 402 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.2d 1013, 420 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-lee-nyappdiv-1979.