Goodwin v. . Lamport Holt, Ltd.

142 N.E. 287, 236 N.Y. 570, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 997
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodwin v. . Lamport Holt, Ltd., 142 N.E. 287, 236 N.Y. 570, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 997 (N.Y. 1923).

142 N.E. 287 (Goodwin v. . Lamport Holt, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palm v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.
200 F.2d 67 (Second Circuit, 1952)