Goodwin v. Glazer

California Supreme Court

Goodwin v. Glazer

10 Cal. 333

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 10 Cal. 333 (Goodwin v. Glazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodwin v. Glazer, 10 Cal. 333 (Cal. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.

The mandamus in this case was improperly granted. Plaintiff had recovered a moneyed judgment, upon which the clerk of [334]*334the Court refused to issue execution. For all damages resulting from this refusal, the plaintiff has, in ordinary course of law, a plain and adequate remedy, by an action on the bond of the officer, and it is well settled that the writ will not issue in such cases.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.

The mandamus in this case was improperly granted. Plaintiff had recovered a moneyed judgment, upon which the clerk of [334]*334the Court refused to issue execution. For all damages resulting from this refusal, the plaintiff has, in ordinary course of law, a plain and adequate remedy, by an action on the bond of the officer, and it is well settled that the writ will not issue in such cases.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Cal. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-glazer-cal-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack