Goodwin v. Durkin
This text of 22 F. App'x 873 (Goodwin v. Durkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The bankruptcy court had jurisdiction over this matter and properly overruled Michael Goodwin’s objections to the Trustee’s final report and application for fees. Goodwin’s objections were barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral es-toppel. See Clark v. Bear Steams & Co., Inc., 966 F.2d 1318, 1320 (9th Cir.1992).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-durkin-ca9-2001.