Goodwin v. Durham & Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Goodwin v. Durham & Southern Railway Co.

150 S.E. 925, 197 N.C. 792, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 385

DecidedOctober 23, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E. 925 (Goodwin v. Durham & Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodwin v. Durham & Southern Railway Co., 150 S.E. 925, 197 N.C. 792, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 385 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered by plaintiff upon the trial of this action, viewed in the light most favorable to him, in accordance with the well established rule in this jurisdiction, fails to sustain the allegations of plaintiffs that his horses were killed by the negligence of defendant. There was no error in the judgment dismissing the action as upon nonsuit. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered by plaintiff upon the trial of this action, viewed in the light most favorable to him, in accordance with the well established rule in this jurisdiction, fails to sustain the allegations of plaintiffs that his horses were killed by the negligence of defendant. There was no error in the judgment dismissing the action as upon nonsuit. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E. 925, 197 N.C. 792, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-durham-southern-railway-co-nc-1929.