Goodwin v. Department of Agriculture

358 F. App'x 152
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedDecember 16, 2009
DocketNo. 2010-3031
StatusPublished

This text of 358 F. App'x 152 (Goodwin v. Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goodwin v. Department of Agriculture, 358 F. App'x 152 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Opinion

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The Department of Agriculture moves to dismiss Raymond L. Goodwin’s petition for review as untimely. Goodwin opposes. The United States replies.

The Merit Systems Protection Board issued a final decision on August 21, 2009, 112 M.S.P.R. 301, and served Goodwin via electronic mail on the same day. The Board informed Goodwin that its decision was final and that any petition for review must be received by this court within 60 calendar days of receipt of the Board’s decision. Pursuant to the Board’s regulations, “Board documents served electronically on registered e-filers are deemed received on the date of electronic submission,” i.e., August 21, 2009, in this case. The court received Goodwin’s petition for review on November 4, 2009, 75 days after Goodwin received the Board’s decision.

A petition for review must be received by the court within 60 days of receipt of the Board’s final order. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1). To be timely filed, the petition must be received by this court within 60 days of the date of receipt of the Board’s final order by Goodwin. Monzo v. Dep’t of Transp., Fed. Aviation Admin., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed.Cir.1984). Because Goodwin’s petition was not timely received by this court, it must be dismissed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 F. App'x 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-department-of-agriculture-cafc-2009.