Home/Third Circuit/Goodwin v. Celutel, Inc.

Goodwin v. Celutel, Inc.

931 F.2d 50, 1991 WL 58299
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 15, 1991·No. 90-1701·Published

Opinion

931 F.2d 50

Goodwin (Barclay R., Jr.), Cellular Logic, Inc., Cell
Cal-II, Cellucall, Inc., GBBV Investment Co., Laurmann
(Giselle V.), Morelli (Robert), Neoteric Communications
Group, Ramcell, Inc. R.H. Associates, Tricel Group, U.S.
Cellular, Inc., Port Services Co., Capper (Emmett M.),
Jordan (Robert Bruce), Russell (Owen C.), B & L Cellular,
Suggs (Gordon), U.S. Cellular
v.
Celutel, Inc., Scarpa (Frank S.), McCaw Cellular
Communications, Inc., Vanguard Cellullar Serv.

NO. 90-1701

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

MAR 15, 1991

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Kelly, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goodwin v. Celutel, Inc., 931 F.2d 50, 1991 WL 58299 (3d Cir. 1991).

931 F.2d 50 (Goodwin v. Celutel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.