Goodwin v. Burney
This text of 14 P. 676 (Goodwin v. Burney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action of ejectment for a tract of land. As to the facts given in evidence going to show the plaintiff’s legal possession of the premises in dispute, prior to the defendant’s entry thereupon, and as to those relative to the character of the defendant’s entry, whether or not it was in good faith, and under a claim of right adverse to that of the plaintiff, there is a decided conflict, for which reason the order refusing a new trial should be affirmed.
We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Hayne, C.
By the COURT.—For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 P. 676, 2 Cal. Unrep. 786, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-burney-cal-1887.