Goodwin v. Arlington Hospital Ass'n
This text of 3 Va. Cir. 362 (Goodwin v. Arlington Hospital Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arlington County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories propounded to Defendants, Drs. Neefe and Nirschl, is presented for determination by the Court. I have carefully considered the able arguments of counsel and authorities submitted by them.
It is my opinion that Plaintiff is entitled to answers to the standard of medical care interrogatories within the ambit of Rule 4:1 of the Supreme Court of Virginia. I can find no valid Fifth Amendment nor attorney-client privileges to be asserted. Defendants cannot invoke any privilege against being called as a witness in a civil suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Va. Cir. 362, 1985 Va. Cir. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-arlington-hospital-assn-vaccarlington-1985.