Goodwin v. Abilene State Bank
This text of 287 S.W. 1111 (Goodwin v. Abilene State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
Eight questions have been certified herein by the Court of Civil Appeals for the Eleventh District. The statement of the case, as contained in the certificate, embraces the substance of the pleadings of the parties and a lengthy and detailed statement of the facts in .evidence. The questions certified relate to the sufficiency of the'pleadings and the evidence'to raise issues of fraudulent representations and fraudulent concealment' upon which the appellants rely to defeat a recovery by the appellee; to the sufficiency of the pleading and proof to estop the appellants from relying on such fraud; to questions of procedure and practice. In short it appears from the certificate that the entire case has been sent up to the Supreme Court for opinion as to how it should be decided. The aspects of the certificate here are of the same general nature as. those which met the condemnation .of the Supreme Court in the case of Kelley-Goodfellow Shoe Co. v. Liberty Insurance Co., 87 Texas, 112.
We therefore recommend that the certificate be dismissed, and this opinion be certified to the Court of Civil Appeals that it may decide the cause in due course of business.
The opinion of the Commission of Appeals recommending a dismissal of the certified questions is adopted and certificate dismissed.
C. M. Cureton, Chief Justice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 S.W. 1111, 116 Tex. 134, 1926 Tex. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-v-abilene-state-bank-tex-1926.