Goodwein v. Fitrer

Fourth Circuit

Goodwein v. Fitrer

127 F. App'x 116

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2005·No. No. 04-2495·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alfred B. Goodwein appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goodwein v. Fitrer, No. CA-04-202-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Alfred B. Goodwein appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goodwein v. Fitrer, No. CA-04-202-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Goodwein v. Fitrer, 127 F. App'x 116 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

127 F. App'x 116 (Goodwein v. Fitrer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related