GOODUES v. State

340 S.W.3d 606, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 586, 2011 WL 1531985
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 19, 2011
DocketED 94844
StatusPublished

This text of 340 S.W.3d 606 (GOODUES v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GOODUES v. State, 340 S.W.3d 606, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 586, 2011 WL 1531985 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jesse Goodues (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 after an evidentia-ry hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Giancola
340 S.W.3d 606 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 S.W.3d 606, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 586, 2011 WL 1531985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodues-v-state-moctapp-2011.